Professor and student meeting to review paper
Collection

Collaborative Grading

These resources explore the practice of collaborative grading, an alternative grading approach in which students and instructors determine grades for a given course in consultation with one another.

Updated January 2025
Emily Pitts Donahoe headshot
Associate Director of Instructional Support
University of Mississippi Center for Excellence in Teaching & Learning
View Bio
01

What is Ungrading? What is Collaborative Grading?

Unmaking the Grade

In this blog post, I define the emerging practice of collaborative grading and distinguish it from the term "ungrading."

Headshot of Emily Pitts Donahoe
Emily Pitts Donahoe

Digging into conversations about alternative grading for the first time can be confusing, in part due to the fact that "ungrading" can mean so many different things. Getting our terms straight, as I attempt to do here, is the first step.

View excerpt

I define collaborative grading as a system in which students and instructors determine grades for a given course in consultation with one another, usually through a process that combines extensive instructor feedback with regular student self-assessment and opportunities for students to continuously enhance their understanding through revisions, retakes, or resubmissions. Instructors who grade collaboratively offer feedback on student work throughout the semester but typically refrain from assigning points or letter grades to that work.

Was this resource helpful?
02

Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead)

Susan D. Blum

This 2020 collection on "ungrading" explores how K12 and higher education instructors across a range of disciplines have implemented alternative grading practices in their classrooms. Chapters by Jesse Stommel, Susan Blum, Arthur Chiaravalli, Gary Chu, Marcus Schultz-Bergin, and Joy Kirr in particular discuss the approach I've defined as "collaborative grading"—but many others provide much-needed inspiration for designing collaborative grading systems.

Headshot of Emily Pitts Donahoe
Emily Pitts Donahoe

This collection inspired many college educators to begin experimenting with their grading systems. Combining philosophical reflection and practical approaches, it remains an invaluable resource for instructors who are intrigued by the possibilities of collaborative grading.

View excerpt

Because of the system in place, a letter grade must be issued at the end of each term. A combination of individualized descriptive feedback on the student's work, revisions and multiple attempts at demonstrating understanding, and one-on-one conferences with students throughout each semester leads us to determine an appropriate grade for the term. Yes, us. The thing that was missing was not whether things counted for points or the type of assessment. It was student input. Students making a case for a grade show such a high level of comprehension, digestion of the content, and metacognition. Through written reflections, vlogs, podcasts, and in-person conferences, students make the case for their grade—and I just listen.

Was this resource helpful?
03

Ungrading: an FAQ

Jesse Stommel

In this blog post, ungrading advocate Jesse Stommel answers frequently asked questions about his grading practices that focus on student self-reflection and metacognition.

Headshot of Emily Pitts Donahoe
Emily Pitts Donahoe

Jesse Stommel hasn't put a grade on a piece student work in more than 20 years. This short blog post answers common questions about his practice, including how he collaborates with students to determine final grades and what prompts he uses to facilitate student self-reflection.

View excerpt

Students in my classes give themselves a grade at the end of the term. I say, 'I reserve the right to change grades as appropriate,' but over 20 years, I’ve seen students grade themselves incredibly fairly. The students in my courses get As, Bs, Cs, and even Fs.

Was this resource helpful?
04

Keeping Receipts: Thoughts on Ungrading from a Black Woman Professor

Zeal: A Journal for the Liberal Arts

In this short article, Laila McCloud discusses her experiences implementing ungrading as a Black woman and the necessary practice of "keeping receipts" in teaching contexts impacted by white supremacy.

Headshot of Emily Pitts Donahoe
Emily Pitts Donahoe

We can't ignore the fact that our identities impact the way we teach and the ways students respond to our teaching. Laila McCloud's piece takes an honest look at how her identity as a Black woman affects her grading practice, prompting important reflections for all practitioners of collaborative grading.

View excerpt

However, the discourse around ungrading as a liberatory pedagogical practice has ignored the ways that white supremacy and whiteness impact its implementation. I enter this conversation as a Black woman professor who uses ungrading, and I want to note my experience with its limitations...For Black faculty like myself who identify as critical pedagogues, there is a tension between institutional expectations of our bodies and our desire to create learning environments that affirm the full complexity of the students we teach.

Was this resource helpful?
05

Ungrading in STEM Courses

Zeal: A Journal for the Liberal Arts

In this short article, Robert Talbert explains how, and why, STEM instructors might implement a grading system in which students and instructors collaboratively determine course grades.

Headshot of Emily Pitts Donahoe
Emily Pitts Donahoe

Many people believe that collaborative grading is ill-suited to STEM courses in which, we assume, student answers are either right or wrong. Robert Talbert deftly dismantles this misconception, arguing for the importance of conceptual understanding and demonstrating how collaborative grading might facilitate it.

View excerpt

Ungrading in STEM Courses

Zeal: A Journal for the Liberal Arts
Open resource

Whatever your choice, ungrading is not only possible in a STEM course, it can be a transformative way for students to encounter the STEM disciplines as they truly are: away of understanding the world that admits multiple ways of knowing, bolstered by iterative conversations among people journeying together toward understanding.

Was this resource helpful?

Want to recommend a resource to add to this collection? Send us an email.